SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 105

ARUNABHA BARUA
KRISHNA CHANDRA CHAUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, KRISHNA GHOSH, S.MOITRA

A. BARUA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for the purpose of quashing of the investigational proceedings of Bhatar P. S. Case No. 48 dated 9. 5. 97 under sections 325/326/329/347/467/469 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the corresponding proceedings of G. R. Case No. 609/97 of the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Burdwan and this, is directed against Order dated 25. 4. 97 passed by Sri T. K. Das, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-in-Charge, Burdwan in FIR Case No. 226/97 whereby the learned Magistrate passed an order in terms of section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure pursuant to which the aforesaid case was registered for investigation.

( 2 ) PETITIONER, Krishna Chandra Choudhury, was to run a petrol pump. The complainant, Nityananda Saha, who was a Scheduled Caste, was a clerk over there at a monthly salary of Rs. 1,500/ -. In short, the incident was over severe assault on the complainant by the petitioner because the complainant had failed to record inflated shortage of petrol in the rele














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top