SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 369

P.K.BISWAS
LALU ALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amalendu Pal, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, Chandrayi Alam, K.DUTT, SUDIPTA MOITRA

P. K. BISWAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under section 401 read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the petitioner, namely, Lalu Alam seeking to set aside the order dated 6th December, 1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 7 (5)/1992 by Shri S. Gupta, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Court, Alipore rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for deferring the cross-examination of P W 1, the victim of this case until the remaining eye witnesses were examined-in-chief.

( 2 ) THE short facts leading to the filing of this revisional application are as follows : the present petitioner along with 6 others were placed on trial in Sessions Trial No. 7 (5)/1992 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Court, Alipore, 24 Parganas (S) to answer charges under sections 307/325/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code upon an allegation that on 16th August 1990, there was a call for ?calcutta Bandh? by the Congress (I) Party. In support of the said call for bandh, Miss Mamata Banerjee on that day organized several meetings, picketings and processions.

( 3 ) WHILE one of such processions, in support of bandh was proceeding near the Hazra S. P. Mukherjee Roa

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top