SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 155

AJOY NATH RAY, MAHARAJ SINHA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
A. B. C. INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ghosh, KHAITAN

Ajoy Nath Ray, Maharaj Sinha

( 1 ) THIS is an application for recall of an ex parte order passed on February 13, 2001, when a reference Bench of our High Court passed an order under Section 256 (2) causing three questions to be referred to itself. On that day, the assessee did not appear before the reference Bench. The assessee has since filed an application for recall of the ex parte order. As a point of jurisdiction of two High Courts is involved we requested learned counsel to get ready on the jurisdictiona! aspect itself and to argue out the matter before us, not leaving it merely at the stage of setting aside of an ex parte order.

( 2 ) WE have received due assistance from both sides in that regard today.

( 3 ) BY an order passed on the July 28, 1997, the assessee's assessments were transferred from Gauhati to Calcutta. Copies of the transfer order handed up from the assessee's side duly countersigned be kept on record.

( 4 ) THE reference application was however made in regard to a decision given by the Gauhati Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Even an application made under Sub-section (1) of Section 256 by the Revenue was rejected by that Tribunal at Gauhati. T







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top