SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 187

NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
SANKAR GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
RAKSHIT KUMAR GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KARABI GHOSH, SANDIP DAS, SARDAR AMJAD ALI

N. C. SIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 5. 5. 1998 and 30. 6. 1998 respectively passed by Sri M. K. Chowdhuri, Civil Judge, Senior Division, Diamond Harbour, South 24-Parganas in connection with Title Appeal No. 48 of 1997 reversing the judgment and decree dated 23. 7. 1996 passed by Sri A. N. Roy, learned Munsif, Second Court, Diamond, Harbour in connection with Title Suit No. 53 1987.

( 2 ) IT appears from the record that the suit before the learned Munsif was for declaration and injunction. The learned Munsif was pleased to dismiss the suit on contest while the lower appellate Court reversed the judgment of the trial Court and having allowed the appeal decreed the suit.

( 3 ) THE plaint case in brief is that the properties in plot Nos. 839 and 840 originally belonged to four brothers namely Ganesh, Priyanath, Sitanath and Lalmohan Ghosh. There was no partition of the suit plots amongst the four brothers. Suit plots consist of plot Nos. 831, 832, 833 and 834 out of which plot No. 833 is a tank and other three plots are danga. The non-suit plot Nos. 839 and 840 are the undivided family dwelling house. One Lalmohon, the predecessor


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top