SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 644

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, HRISHIKESH BANERJI
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS – Appellant
Versus
TERAI OVERSEAS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHUTOSH LAL, DEBAL BANERJI, S.N.ROY, SUDHIN MEHTA

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference application under Section 130a of the Customs Act, 1962 [hereinafter called the said Act] has been filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai in respect of an order dated 21-6-2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Regional Bench, Calcutta [hereinafter called as CEGAT], In the said application, 8 (eight) question were framed.

( 2 ) THE said application came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court and the said Division Bench, by an order dated 17-4-2001, after hearing the learned Counsels appearing for the parties, directed the Tribunal to refer to only one question for the opinion of this Court.

( 3 ) THE question which was referred to by the Division Bench is as follows :"whether the drawback is allowable more particularly in terms of Rule 13 (2) (iv) of the Drawback Rules, 1995 wherein the exporters were required to submit a valid insurance certificate along with the drawback claim. A perusal of the drawback application submitted by the claimants show that the Insurance Certificate was invalid and has been cancelled by the Insurance Company before the exports were effected?"

(































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top