MALAY KUMAR BASU
BINOD KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA PROSAD SHUKLA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the order dated 14th August, 1996 passed by the Ld. Additional District judge, 1st Court, Howrah in Misc. Appeal No. 44 of 1992. By that order that Court affirmed the order dated 3rd February, 1992 passed by the Ld. Munsif, 4th Court. Howrah in T. S. No. 26/1992 granting an ad interim injunction ex parte directing both the parties to the suit to maintain status quo of the suit property till the disposal of the injunction-petition under Order 39, C. P. C. The relevant facts were as follows. The suit No. T. S. 26/1992 was filed by the plaintiff-respondent praying for a decree for declaration of title and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing plaintiffs peaceful possession in the suit property and the plaintiffs also prayed for temporary injunction to the above effect till the final disposal of the suit. While passing the order for issuing notice upon the defendants to show cause why the temporary injunction as prayed for would not be granted the Ld. Munsif passed the impugned order granting the aforementioned interim injunction by directing the parties to maintain status quo till the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.