SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 630

ALOK KUMAR BASU
GOUR CHANDRA DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMALES ROY, D.N.MUKHERJI, Purnasis Roy

ALOK KUMAR BASU, J.

( 1 ) DESPITE service of notice, none appears on behalf of the State Respondents. Affidavit of service filed today be kept on record.

( 2 ) THIS is an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging order dated 27. 6. 02 passed by the Id. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Cooch behar in Title Execution No. 2 of 02.

( 3 ) THE fact of the case is that the petitioner herein got an arbitration award relating to a work within the jurisdiction of Cooch Behar Sadar and to enforce with arbitration award in accordance with section 36 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner filed an appropriate application before the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Cooch Behar.

( 4 ) THE learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Cooch Behar by his order dated 27th june, 2002 after considering section 2 (e) of the Arbitration Act read with section 42 and also after considering section 2 (4) of the Civil Procedure Code was of the view that he not being the Principal Civil Judge as mentioned in section 2 (e) of the Arbitration Act, he has no jurisdiction to entertain the application for enforcement of the arbitration award and hence, he refused to entertain the sai







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top