ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, HRISHIKESH BANERJI
SHRABONI DEY – Appellant
Versus
HOWRAH MOTOR CO. LTD – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellants are contributories and shareholders of the Howrah Motor Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the said company) and the appeal is from an order dated 15th March, 2002 passed by the Company Judge in a winding up proceeding being Company petition No. 240/98, holding that the settlement between the said company and the petitioning creditor Luxmi Tea Company, has been arrived at in the best interest of the company and no winding up order was made in view of that settlement.
( 2 ) MATERIAL facts of the case are that by two separate cheques the petitioning creditor, the second respondent in this appeal, lent and advanced on diverse dates in January, 1996, Rs. 16 lakh and also Rs. 1 crore to the company and the company was to pay on this intercorporate loan an interest @ 24% per annum and the loan was for a period of 6 months.
( 3 ) AS the company failed to pay the loan, a winding up petition was presented by the 2nd respondent, the petitioning creditor, in the month of August, 1998. On such petition, the winding up Court by an order passed on or about 2nd of september, 1998, admitted the petition and granted certain instalments as the com
REFERRED TO : Deshbandhu Gupta and Company vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Ltd.
Allahabad Bank vs. Bengal Paper Mill
Deshbandhu Gupta and Company vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Ltd.
Pulavarthi Venkata Subba Rao vs. Valluri Jagannadha Rao
Ruby Sales and Services (P) Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.