SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 383

High Court Of Calcutta
A. K. MATHUR, ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE
BIKASH TALUKDAR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
M. A. T.  1355  Of  2001
Decided On : 08/01/2003

Advocates Appeared:
B.R.NEOGI, L.K.Gupta, TAPAN SARKAR

A co-operative society is not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution unless the State Government has pervasive control over its finances, management, and administration.

Headnote:

WRIT PETITION - MAINTAINABILITY - CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY - 'STATE' WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 12 OF THE CONSTITUTION - WEST BENGAL STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. - NOT A 'STATE' - WRITS NOT MAINTAINABLE.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an employee of the West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd., challenged his dismissal from service. The respondents objected to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the Society was not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Society was not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution and dismissed the writ petition.

Issues: Whether the West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. is a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Society was not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution because the State Government did not have pervasive control over the Society's finances, management, and administration. The court noted that the Society was managed by a Board of Directors elected by the members, and that the State Government had only a minority of seats on the Board.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition.

A. K. MATHUR, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal directed against the order dated 2nd April, 2001 passed by the learned single Judge whereby the learned single Judge has upheld the objection of the respondents that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. is not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution. The learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the Co-operative Society is not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution so as to maintain the writ petition. Hence, aggrieved against the aforesaid order the present appeal.

( 2 ) FOR convenient disposal of this appeal, brief facts may be narrated. The petitioner was an employee of the West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. The petitioner challenged the order dated 1. 11. 1986 whereby he was dismissed from the service. The aforesaid order was passed after holding the regular inquiry. The challenge of the petitioner was that the order of dismissal was arbitrary and illegal and without holding any inquiry and without giving any reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. An objection was raised before the learned single Judge by the respondents that since the petitioner was an employee of the Co-operative Society and the society is not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution therefore the present writ petition is not maintainable. The learned single Judge relying on a decision of this Court (Altamas Kabir, J.) in C. O. No. 11357 (W) of 1996 and W. P. 21846 (W) of 1997 (Dipak Kumar Roy v. The West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. and Ors. with Smt. Papia Pal v. The West Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. and Ors.) against this very Society upheld the objection that the present Co-operative Society is not a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, therefore the writ petition is not maintainable.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the Appellant has submitted that this Society has a large share held by the Government and the Government has all pervasive control in the management of the Society. Therefore it is a 'state' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, and in support of that learned counsel has relied on various decisions of the Apex Court, i. e. Ajay Hasia etc. v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi and Ors. (AIR 1981 SC 487), Shri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandasjiswami and Ors. v. V. R. Rudani and Ors. (AIR 1989 SC 1607), Indra Kumar Chopra v. Pradeshik Co-operative Dairy Federation Ltd. and Ors. (AIR SC 2093), N. S. Giri v. The Corporation of City Mangalore and Ors. [ (1999 2 SLR 630], Ram Sahan Rai v. Sachiv Samanaya Prabandhak and Anr. [2001 3 SCC 323], and Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology [2002 5 SCC 111]. Before we proceed to deal with the aforesaid cases, we may refer to the necessary Bye-Laws of the Society.

( 4 ) THE Society was registered under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 and they framed Bye-Laws known as ?west Bengal State Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. Bye-Laws?. The object of the Society as enumerated, in section 4 highlights that it would organise the handloom industry in West Bengal on Co-operative basis by arranging production and sale of handloom fabrics on commercial lines and to facilitate the operation of the affiliated societies engaged in production and/or marketing of handloom fabrics within the State. There are number of objectives and we need not to deal each one of them, but for our purposes suffice it to say that the main objective is to encourage the handloom industry and the fabrics and persons who are engaged in this profession for their benefit. Bye-law 6 deals with the membership. The State Government, i. e. Government of West Bengal is one of the Members, Co-operative Societies of Producers of handloom goods registered in





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top