SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 394

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA
SAHARUDDIN NASKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABDUL HAMID, CHABI ROY, PRABIR ROY CHAUDHARY, RANJAN SANYAL, SWAPAN MALLICK

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN the present application the petitioners have challenged an order dated 11. 6. 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions judge, 2nd Fast Track Court, Alipore in Sessions Trial No. 2 (6) 2003 thereby framing charge under sections 302/34/498a of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) OVER the incident of death of one Samsunnehar Bibi Bishnupur P. S. Case No. 106 dated 13. 4. 98 was registered under sections 498a/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Humayun Mollah (present O. P. No. 2) against the present petitioners.

( 3 ) PETITIONER No. 5 herein also lodged a complaint before the learned s. D. J. M. on the death of his wife Samsunnehar Bibi. Said complaint was forwarded to Bishnupur police station and was registered as Bishnupur P. S. Case No. 170 dated 22. 6. 98 under sections 149/302/120b/34 of Indian Penal code against the present Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 8.

( 4 ) ON completion of investigation police submitted chargesheet in Bishnupur p. S. case No. 106 under sections 149/302/120b I. P. C. against the present petitioners. In Bishnupur P. S. case No. 170 also chargesheet was submitted by the police under sections















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top