SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 664

P.K.BISWAS
NATARAJ ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
ILLORA SARKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK DEY, GOUTAM CHAKRABORTY, H.N.MUKHERJEE, L.MONDAL, SYMA PRASANNA ROY CHAUDHURY

PRADIP KUMAR BISWAS, J.

( 1 ) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of confirmation dated November 31,2000 passed by the Id. Additional district Judge, 13th Court, South 24-Parganas, Alipore in Title Appeal No. 207 of 2000. By his judgment and decree the Id. Judge was pleased, to affirm the judgment and decree dated June, 13, 2000 passed by the Id. Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 9th Court in Title Suit No. 39 of 1991.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/respondent of this suit came up with this suit with the prayer for ejectment on evicting the defendant and for mesne profits etc.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff/respondent in short is as follows.

( 4 ) PLAINTIFF became the owner of flat No. 1d in question by virtue of purchase by a registered deed of purchase dated 22. 7. 1990. It has been alleged by the plaintiff that the defendant was a tenant under the plaintiff since 2nd August, 1982 in respect of the suit flat described in schedule "a" to the plaint with fittings and fixtures described in schedule 'b' to the plaint at a rental of rs. 2,400/- per month together with hire charges at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per month and Rs. 600/- per month as service charge for multi-storie




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top