SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 276

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE
SHRIMATI SIKHA GORAI – Appellant
Versus
SUBODH CHANDRA GORAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KISHORE DUTTA

S. K. MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE opposite party-husband instituted a matrimonial suit under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the parties on June 11, 1997 as per Hindu rights and customs.

( 2 ) IN the wedlock a male child has been born and the child is now aged about four years. The male child is in the custody of the mother.

( 3 ) THE wife-petitioner in the said suit filed an application under section 24 of the said Act of 1995 claiming alimony pendente lite and expenses of the proceedings. The learned Additional District Judge, First Court at Asansol, District: Burdwan allowed the said application in part and directed the opposite party-husband to pay Rs. 1000/- (Rupees one thousand) only to the petitioner-wife towards alimony pendente lite for herself and the minor son with effect from the date of filing of the said application under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The learned judge assessed the arrears of maintenance at Rs. 9000/- (Rupees nine thousand) only and directed the opposite party-husband to pay the said sum by eighteen equal instalments at the rate of Rs. 500/- (Rupees five hundred) only per month


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top