SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 297

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
AMAL KUMAR BOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMALENDU MITRA, HARIDAS, S.CHAUDHARY

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein has filed this application challenging the inaction on the part of the police authorities for taking steps to recover the vehicle which according to the petitioner has been taken away by the muscle men of HSBC Ltd. Admittedly, the said vehicle was taken under the Hire purchase Agreement executed with the hsbc Ltd.

( 2 ) THE learned Counsel of the petitioner submits that the monthly instalment for the month of May, 2003 could not be paid due to the failure of the Banker of the petitioner and due to the non-payment of the said instalment the muscle men of HSBC Ltd. took forcible possession of the vehicle from the petitioner on 7-6-2003.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel of the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7 admits that no order has been obtained from any Court of law for taking possession of the said vehicle in terms of the hire purchase agreement. According to the learned Counsel of the Bank, the possession of the vehicle was taken under the agreement for failure of making payment of the instalments.

( 4 ) IN my view, in a civilised society the financial institutions, particularly the bankers, cannot take possession of the vehicle by











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top