SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 97

ARUN KUMAR MITRA
NALINI KUMAR MAJUMDER ALIAS NALINI RANJAN MAJUMDER – Appellant
Versus
DWIJENDRA KR. SIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMAN KANTI BASU, L.M.Ghosh, Sitaram Bhattacharyya

A. K. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) CHALLENGING the judgment dated September 5, 1986 and the decree dated September 17, 1986 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Second Court, Nadia in Title Appeal Nos. 102 of 1985 and 103 of 1985 affirming the judgments dated 1. 3. 1985 and decree dated 11. 3. 1985 passed by the learned Munsif, Second Court at Ranaghat, Nadia in T. S. No. 706 of 1980 these two second appeals have been preferred. The Title Suit No. 380 of 1980 and Title Suit No. 706 of 1980 were tried analogously and by a single judgment both the suits were disposed of. Accordingly, Title Appeal No. 102 of 1985 and 103 of 1985 were also heard analogously and both the appeals were disposed of by a single judgment. The back-drop of the appeals as come out from the records is, inter alia, as follows:

( 2 ) NALINI Kr. Majumder being the plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 474 of 1978 on 14. 12. 1978 and on transfer it was renumbered as Title Suit No 380 of 1980 against Dwijendra Kr. Sil being the defendant. This suit is a suit for declaration of title mandatory injunction and eviction of a licensee. In Title Suit No. 380 of 1980 the plaintiff alleged that the suit land belonged to him and th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top