SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 274

PRADIPTA RAY, A.N.RAY
KAKALI DAS GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
ASISH KUMAR DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DAS

A. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed by the wife from a judgment and decree of the learned District Judge allowing a petition filed by the husband for divorce.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the married life, and the litigation, are as follows. The parties were married on 12. 12. 1994 and a son was born to them on the 3rd day of January, 1996. The wife is a single issue of her parents but the husband had two other brothers, of whom one, a police officer was unfortunately killed.

( 3 ) THE parties resided with the parents of the husband at Mangultan village.

( 4 ) THE facts clearly show that the appellant all along wanted her husband to live separately with herself and not in joint mess with her-in-laws. Sometime on or about the 1st of June, 1996, the appellant left the matrimonial home with her son. But a sort of reconciliation was made on the date of their marriage anniversary i. e. 12. 12. 1996 the wife returned to the matrimonial home.

( 5 ) THEREAFTER on the 12th of February, 1997 she finally left the house of her in-laws with her son.

( 6 ) IT appears from the evidence that she left in the early morning, and empty handed.

( 7 ) THE respondent filed on 11. 4. 1997 a pet














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top