SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 459

A.K.MATHUR, ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE
BHARAT COKING COAL LTD – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA PRATAP NARAYAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK BANERJEE, ANVARI QUARESHI, BIJOY K.MOHANTY

ASHOK KUMAR MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal directed against order dated September 4, 1998 passed by a learned single Judge whereby the learned single Judge allowed the writ petition and set aside the order of punishment imposed upon the petitioner by the disciplinary authority as well as by the appellate authority. However, the Learned single Judge directed the Chairman-cum-managing Director of Coal India Limited to initite an appropriate departmental proceedings against the petitioner from the stage of appointing an enquiry officer and a presenting officer and such proceedings would be held de novo. Aggrieved against this order the present appeal has been filed by the Management.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal are that the petitioner at the relevant time was a Chief Mining engineer/project Manager in Kooridih colliery belonging to Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. He was charge-sheeted on September 15, 1992 for failure to maintain devotion to duty and for acting in a manner prejudicial to the interest and image of the company. That he was negligent in the performance of duty. On the basis of this charge-sheet an enquiry was initiated against the peti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top