SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 464

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA
GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Jain, SUDIPTA SARKAR, SUHIT ROY CHOWDHURY, Tilak Basu

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by the Great Eastern shipping Company Limited a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, against the judgement and order dated 07. 04. 2003 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court.

( 2 ) BY the impugned judgement, the learned Single Judge, inter alia, held that, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Chairman of the Board of trustees for the Port of Kolkata is entitled to appoint an arbitrator in accordance with the arbitration clause in Charter Party within a period of 4 weeks, from the date of communication of His Lordship's judgment and order and the appellants' prayer for reference of the application to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for appointment of an arbitrator was rejected.

( 3 ) SINCE impugned judgement of the learned Single Judge has been stayed pending this appeal, no arbitrator has yet been appointed.

( 4 ) THE material facts of the instant case are that under a Charter Party dated 12. 02. 2002, the appellant gave on hire a tug to the respondent on terms and conditions contained in the said Charter Party.

( 5 ) THE case of the appellant is that the said tug came to the jetty on 14. 02.





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top