PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil procedure is directed against the order dated 22-7-2002 passed in Misc. Case No. 44 of 2000. The aforesaid Misc. Case arises out of an application filed by the opposite parties herein under Order 21, Rule 99 and 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The trial Court by the aforesaid impugned order held that the said Misc. Case is maintainable in law by rejecting the contention of the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of contract being T. S. 185 of 1991 against the opposite parties Nos. 3 to 7. At the appellate stage a compromise decree was passed and it is the case of the petitioner that while she made an application in the suit for police help for taking possession of the suit property, the sons of the opposite party No. 3 who was the original defendant No. 1 and who alone entered into an agreement to sell the suit property to the petitioner, resisted the execution of the decree. The misc. case that arose out of the application filed by the sons of the opposite party No. 3 was dismissed. Such dismissal was further affirmed by this Court. The petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document