SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 499

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
BASUDEV MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMALES ROY, BALAI LAL SAHU, D.MUKHERJI, MOHAMMAD ALI

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ application the writ petitioner, an approved assistant teacher of a school has challenged Annexure -P/14 to the instant writ application by which he was suspended in terms of the management Rule 28 (9) (viia) with effect from July 27, 2003 till the disposal of a criminal case.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case under immoral Traffic Prevention Act and was consequently arrested on July 27, 2003, he remained in custody till August 12, 2003 and on that date he was released on bail. Subsequently, by order, dated September 1, 2003 the Managing Committee of the school by passing the order impugned suspended the petitioner with effect from July 27, 2003 till the disposal of the case.

( 3 ) BEING dissatisfied petitioner has come up before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 4 ) IT is contended by Mr. Sahoo, learned Advocate for the petitioner that there cannot be any suspension from an anterior date, and, as such, the order of suspension should be set aside.

( 5 ) THE aforesaid contention of Mr. Sahoo has been opposed by Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the school auth






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top