SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 145

C.K.BANERJEE
D. T. H. CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPANKAR GHOSH, SOMNATH CHATTERJI, SUDIPTA SARKAR, TAPAS BANERJI, UDAYAN SEN

C. K. BANERJEE, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application for injunction restraining the defendant No. 1, Steel Authority of India Ltd. from enforcing or calling up the Bank Guarantee dated 31-8-1982 for Rs. 30,00,000/- given by the defendant No. 2, United Bank of India in favour of the defendant No. 1. The defendant No. 1 gave a contract to the plaintiff for dredging and deepening a reservoir at Durgapur. To enable the plaintiff to bring the machinery and start the work, the defendant No. 1 advanced Rs. 30,00,000/- to the plaintiff. To secure the said advance of Rs, 30,00,000/- paid by the defendant No. 1 to the plaintiff, the plaintiff gave the said Bank Guarantee through the United Bank of India.

( 2 ) MR. Biswaroop Gupta, learned Counsel for the plaintiff, submitted the plaintiff was induced to obtain the said contract by the defendant No. 1 by suppression of material facts, that the reservoir which was to be cleaned and deepened could not be deepened inasmuch as the bed of the reservoir which was shown in the plan given to the plaintiff as plain and without any undulations was formed and created by inundating a village with a Railway siding and various other structures and facilities f
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top