SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 9

G.N.RAY, SANKARI PRASAD DAS GHOSH
URMILA DASI – Appellant
Versus
PROBODH CH. GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.ROY, MD.AKBARUZAMAN, NANDITA GHOSH, R.P.BAGCHI, S.S.RAY

G. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 9th Court, Alipore, in Title Appeal No. 702 of 1976 reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sub-Judge, First Court, Alipore, in Title Suit No. 4 of 1972.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant in the instant appeal and the title suit was instituted by the plaintiff for declaration of his title to the property in dispute as described in schedule to the plaint and also for a declaration that the defendants Nos. 1 and 2 have no right, title and interest in the suit property and the alleged sale of the disputed property by a deed dt. May 10, 1967 between the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 was not binding upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff also made prayer for recovery of the khas possession of the disputed property after evicting the defendants from the same.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs case is that Tulsibala the mother of the plaintiff purchased on May 12, 1941 the plot in C. S. 563 and 559 since renumbered as R. S. Dag No. 606 and 614 out of her stridhan and built a hut on the said land and thereafter lived with her husband in the said property. The plaintiff's moth















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top