SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 296

PARITOSH KUMAR MUKHERJEE
PROVAT KUMAR CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNKUMAR MOTILAL, CHANDRA SEKHAR DAS, SOMEN CHANDRA BOSE

P. K. MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE present writ petitioner is a Guarantor to Purulia co-operative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the said Bank) for obtaining loan of Rs. 45,000 at an interest of 10% per annum by the respondent Nos. 7 end 8, namely, Biswanath Chatterjee and Smt. Tapati Chatterjee who are carrying on business under the name and style of Bichitra Sales Corporation at purulia, dealing in various kinds of electrical goods etc.

( 2 ) THE respondents Nos. 7 and 8, however, failed to repay Rs. 44,999. 99 on account of "principal" and Rs. 6,743 40 on account of "interest" after expiry of the relevant date i. e. June 28, 1975 and accordingly, the Bank, by service of registered notice dated October 30, 1975, called upon the said respondents Nos. 7 and 8 to repay the said amount.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER, a dispute under Section 86 of the West Bengal Co-operative societies Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was raised before the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Purulia at the instance of the respondent-Bank, and Arbitration Case No. 5 of 1975-76 was started, which was not contested by respondents Nos. 7 and 8.

( 4 ) THE Writ Petitioner being the guar




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top