SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 297

M.M.DUTT, PARITOSH KUMAR MUKHERJEE
BRITISH AIRWAYS – Appellant
Versus
ART WORKS EXPORT LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.AGARWAL, AMALENDU MITRA, B.K.CHATTERJI, BARIN GHOSH, BARUN GOSVAMI, SUBRATA ROY

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. filed at the instance of the defendant No. 1, British Airways, a Public Limited Company, is directed against Order No. 19 dt. April 25, 1985 of the learned Judge, 4th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta dismissing the application of the petitioner under O. 7,r. 11 of the Civil P. C.

( 2 ) THE suit out of which this application arises has been filed by the plaintiff opposite party No. 1, Art Works Export Limited, on March 13,1984 in the City Civil Court, Calcutta against the defendant petitioner and the pro forma defendant opposite party No. 2, the Bank of India, inter alia, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 23,235/- on account of damages, compensation and interest for wrongful loss caused by the defendant petitioner as carrier to the plaintiff opposite party No. 1. The case of the plaintiff opposite party No. 1 is that on Dec. 10, 1981, a consignment containing 2,400. pcs. 'mulberry Raw Silk 100% pure' hand printed stoles were despatched and/or shipped through the British Airways by air from Dum Dum Airport for discharge at Brussel. The Airways bill is dt. Dec. 10, 1981. The name of the consignee of the goods was


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top