SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 84

M.M.DUTT, PARITOSH KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SUB-DIVNL. CONTROLLER, F. AND S. – Appellant
Versus
AMULYA RATAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMULYA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, BHASKAR CH.MANNA, K.K.MOITRA, SAMARENDRA NATH DUTTA

PARITOSH K. MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and order passed by Mr. Justice T. K. Basu dated Aug. 31,1981, in CR No. 5907 (W) of 1981, whereby the learned Judge made the Rule absolute, and quashed the impugned order of cancellation of M. R. Dealership of the writ petitioner, the respondent herein.

( 2 ) IN the present appeal before us, Mr. Samarendra Nath Dutta, learned Advocate for the State of West Bengal and others, the appellants, led by the learned Government pleader, at the very outset, submits that since the writ petitioner is a "modified Ration Dealer" and appointed under an agreement, entered into between the petitioner and the State Government, against the cancellation of the M. R. Dealership of the writ petitioner and the learned Judge should have dismissed the writ petition.

( 3 ) THE learned Government Pleader further submits that as there was substantial compliance with the principles of natural justice by giving two show cause notices to the petitioner, one on April 4, 1981, which is Annexure "a" to the writ petition and the other on April 23, 1981, which is Annexure "d" to the writ petition and the petitioner having submitted replies to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top