SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 216

SANKAR BHATTACHARYYA, M.K.MUKHERJEE
OM PROKASH MODI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.PAL, Dipankar Gupta, J.GHOSH, SAMIR KUMAR GHOSE, UMA SANYAL MISRA

MONOJ KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) OM Prokash Modi, the petitioner in this petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under Art. 226 of the Constitution, is detained by an order dt. Sept. 19,1984 passed by a Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue ). The order was passed in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sub-sec. (1) of S. 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 ('cofeposa' for short) with a view to preventing the petitioner from smuggling goods, abetting the smuggling of goods and engaging in transporting smuggled goods. The sum and substance of the grounds of detention communicated to the petitioner, which run through 39 pages, are as under : on the basis of a secret information the Customs Officers of the Diamond Harbour Preventive Unit intercepted one jeep and one white Ambassador car at Kulpimore, 65 Kms. south of Calcutta, on Mar. 29, 1984. The vehicles were coming from Kakdwip, a place "30 Kms south of Kulpimore, towards Calcutta. There was another chocolate coloured Ambassador car at some distance behind those two vehicles which fled away towards Kakdwip on seeing the Custo










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top