SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 156

SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
INDIAN ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Prosad, Debi Pal

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) UNDER Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (" the Act "), the following questions have been referred as questions of law arising out of the order of the Tribunal for the opinion of this court at the instance of the assessee : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in computing the capital employed for working out the deduction under Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the depreciation in respect of the assets already allowed has to be considered ?

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in computing the capital employed for the purpose of deduction under Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the written down value of the assets has to be considered as per the income-tax records and not as per the assessee's books ? "2. The following questions have also been referred for the opinion of this court as questions of law arising out of the order of the Tribunal at the instance of the Revenue : " 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, an appeal preferred by an assessee who had not filed any objection to the draft assessment order as provided under Sub-section (2) of Section













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top