SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 335

High Court Of Calcutta
L. Ghosh
KALYAN KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE - Appellant
Versus
KWITICK K.SEAL - Respondent
Cr1. R.  2083  Of  1980
Decided On : 08/08/1986

Advocates Appeared:
DIPTI MOITRA

The court upheld the order of the Executive Magistrate under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. based on the satisfaction of apprehension of breach of peace concerning the land and the prudence of the magistrate's actions.

Headnote:

Section 145 - Breach of Peace - The court upheld the order of the Executive Magistrate drawing up proceedings under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. based on the apprehension of breach of peace concerning land, as the magistrate's order was found to be prudent and without infirmity.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner and O. P. No. 1 did not appear in the revisional application against the order of the Executive Magistrate drawing up proceedings under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. based on apprehension of breach of peace concerning land.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after closely scrutinizing the record, found no ground for interfering with the order of the Executive Magistrate. The magistrate's order was deemed prudent and without infirmity, leading to the dismissal of the revisional application.

Issues: The issue revolved around the satisfaction of the Executive Magistrate on the apprehension of breach of peace concerning the land and the prudence of the magistrate's order under section 145 of the Cr. P. C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the magistrate's order under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. based on the satisfaction of apprehension of breach of peace concerning the land and the prudence of the magistrate's actions.

Final Decision: The revisional application was dismissed, and the rule was discharged.

GHOSH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this revisional application has not appeared. The O. P. No. 1 has also not appeared.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the State Mrs. Dipti Moitra, the learned advocate has appeared. The revisional application is directed against the order of the learned Executive Magistrate drawing up proceedings under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. That order is dated 17. 11. 80. As none has appeared for the petitioner, I have not had advantage of hearing the arguments advanced on his behalf. How ever, I have closely scrutinised the record and I find that there is no ground for interfering. Under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. whenever the learned Executive Magistrate is satisfied on police report or otherwise that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land etc. , he shall make an order, requiring the parties to attend the court. In short, the learned Executive Magistrate, if he is satisfied that there is any apprehension of breach of peace concerning any land he can draw the proceeding under section 145 of the Cr P. C. In this case, the learned Magistrate, on the report of the J. L. R. O, Sadar was satisfied that there was apprehension of breach of peace. So he drew up the proceeding under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. He has also taken care to attach the case land and appointed the local Gram-Pradhan the Receiver of the case land and the standing crop. The order is quite a prudent one and does not suffer from any infirmity. The revisional application must be dismissed. The revisional application is dismissed. The rule is discharged.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top