SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 335

L.M.GHOSH
KALYAN KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE – Appellant
Versus
KWITICK K. SEAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPTI MOITRA

GHOSH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this revisional application has not appeared. The O. P. No. 1 has also not appeared.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the State Mrs. Dipti Moitra, the learned advocate has appeared. The revisional application is directed against the order of the learned Executive Magistrate drawing up proceedings under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. That order is dated 17. 11. 80. As none has appeared for the petitioner, I have not had advantage of hearing the arguments advanced on his behalf. How ever, I have closely scrutinised the record and I find that there is no ground for interfering. Under section 145 of the Cr. P. C. whenever the learned Executive Magistrate is satisfied on police report or otherwise that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land etc. , he shall make an order, requiring the parties to attend the court. In short, the learned Executive Magistrate, if he is satisfied that there is any apprehension of breach of peace concerning any land he can draw the proceeding under section 145 of the Cr P. C. In this case, the learned Magistrate, on the report of the J. L. R. O, Sadar was satisfied that there was apprehension of breach o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top