SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 7

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
D. P. KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAL BARAN CHATTERJEE, MAITREYI GHOSH, NONI BHUSAN SIRKAR, TAPAN SEN GUPTA

BHAGAWATI PRASAD BANERJEE, J.


( 1 ) IN the writ petition, the petitioner challenged the validity of the order accepting the quotation/tender submitted by the Respondent 6, Mackintosh Burn Ltd. and the consequential work order, if any, issued in that behalf. The writ petition was moved on 26-9-84 whereupon an ex parte interim order was passed restraining the respondents from giving any effect to or acting on the basis of the purported order accepting the quotation/tender submitted by the Respondent 6 M/s. Mackintosh Burn Ltd. , and the consequent work order, if issued, for completion of the remaining construction of 'banga Bhaban' at No. 3, Hailey Road, New Delhi-1 and from issuing any further order till the disposal of the Rule. Thereafter in terms of the order passed by this Court, the petitioner served copies of the writ application on all the respondents including the respondent 6, M/s. Mackintosh Burn Ltd. But nobody appeared to contest the matter on behalf of the said Respondent 6. The State Respondents appeared and filed an application for vacating the interim order. The petitioner also filed application for contempt alleging violation of the order passed by this Court. The m








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top