SATISH CHANDRA, MUKUL GOPAL MUKHERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
MOHINI THAPAR CHARITABLE TRUST – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question raised in this reference relates to the interpreatation of the second proviso to Section 34 (3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
( 2 ) THE question relates to the assessment year 1955-56, the accounting period for which ended on March 31, 1955. During this accounting period, the assessee, which is a charitable trust, received a sum of Rs. 82,053 from M/s. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. , as commission/ brokerage. It appears that the company had deducted the tax payable on this commission at source. In April, 1956, the assessee-trust filed an application before the Income-tax Officer under Section 48 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the refund of the tax deducted at source. Its plea was that the assessee was a charitable trust not liable to tax. This plea was repelled by the Income-tax Officer, who in view of the C. B. R. 's order No. FN 20/20162-I. T. (AI) dated August 9, 1962, brought this amount of Rs. 82,053 to tax; and after taking into account the amount deducted at source in respect of tax payable on it, raised a demand of Rs. 14,921. 99. He directed that this amount has been adjusted with the refund due to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.