SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 10

SATISH CHANDRA, MUKUL GOPAL MUKHERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
MOHINI THAPAR CHARITABLE TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.NAHA, D.PAL, M.SEAL

SATISH CHANDRA, J.

( 1 ) THE question raised in this reference relates to the interpreatation of the second proviso to Section 34 (3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

( 2 ) THE question relates to the assessment year 1955-56, the accounting period for which ended on March 31, 1955. During this accounting period, the assessee, which is a charitable trust, received a sum of Rs. 82,053 from M/s. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd. , as commission/ brokerage. It appears that the company had deducted the tax payable on this commission at source. In April, 1956, the assessee-trust filed an application before the Income-tax Officer under Section 48 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the refund of the tax deducted at source. Its plea was that the assessee was a charitable trust not liable to tax. This plea was repelled by the Income-tax Officer, who in view of the C. B. R. 's order No. FN 20/20162-I. T. (AI) dated August 9, 1962, brought this amount of Rs. 82,053 to tax; and after taking into account the amount deducted at source in respect of tax payable on it, raised a demand of Rs. 14,921. 99. He directed that this amount has been adjusted with the refund due to the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top