SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 14

A.K.SENGUPTA
PIJUSH KANTI DATTA – Appellant
Versus
MANGILAL GIDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NIRMAL MITRA

AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, J.


( 1 ) THE plaintiff is a practising Barrister of this Court. His wife and his brother-in-law are stated to be the joint owners of the premises No. 4d, Lansdowne Road, Calcutta, where the plaintiff resides with his family in the first floor of the said premises. This suit has been instituted by the plaintiff on 9th August, 1985 for a decree for Rs. 30 lakhs, being the damages allegedly suffered by the plaintiff by reason of certain alleged defamatory words written by the defendant who is a tenant of the second floor of the said premises since 1st October, 1979.

( 2 ) THE defendant entered appearance but did not file any written statement. This suit has appeared before me as an undefended suit on the basis of the Certificate issued by the Registrar, Original Side.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff briefly stated is as follows : the reservoir on the western side of the said premises is the only source of supply of water to the plaintiff and his family in the first floor and to the ground floor of the said premises also occupied by the plaintiff. On 2nd June, 1984 masons and labour were engaged by the owners of the said premises to repair the said reservoir, the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top