A.K.SENGUPTA
PIJUSH KANTI DATTA – Appellant
Versus
MANGILAL GIDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff is a practising Barrister of this Court. His wife and his brother-in-law are stated to be the joint owners of the premises No. 4d, Lansdowne Road, Calcutta, where the plaintiff resides with his family in the first floor of the said premises. This suit has been instituted by the plaintiff on 9th August, 1985 for a decree for Rs. 30 lakhs, being the damages allegedly suffered by the plaintiff by reason of certain alleged defamatory words written by the defendant who is a tenant of the second floor of the said premises since 1st October, 1979.
( 2 ) THE defendant entered appearance but did not file any written statement. This suit has appeared before me as an undefended suit on the basis of the Certificate issued by the Registrar, Original Side.
( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff briefly stated is as follows : the reservoir on the western side of the said premises is the only source of supply of water to the plaintiff and his family in the first floor and to the ground floor of the said premises also occupied by the plaintiff. On 2nd June, 1984 masons and labour were engaged by the owners of the said premises to repair the said reservoir, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.