SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 372

MONORANJAN MALLICK
GULAM MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
NAZAM HOSSAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DHRUBA JYOTI GHOSH, N.N.ADHIKARI, SAMIR CHATTERJEE

MONORANJAN MALLICK, J.


( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dt. 17-2-81 by which Sri A. N. Bhattacharya learned Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Burdwan, refusing to entertain the petitioner's application under S. 319 of the Cr. P. C. for issuing summons upon the opposite parties 1 and 2 namely, Sk. Nazam Hossain and Majnu alias Sk. Manirujeman, for their appearance to face trial with the other accused persons.

( 2 ) IT is submitted that when on the evidence adduced by the prosecution witness No. 1 the opposite parties; 1 and 2 were also implicated in the alleged offences, the learned Additional Sessions Judge illegally rejected the prayer of the public prosecutor in charge of the case, to issue summons against the opposite parties 1 and 2.

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the impugned order rejecting the prayer of the learned Public Prosecutor under S. 319, Cr. P. C. Golam Mondal, who is the de facto complainant, has moved this Court in revision. It is submitted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge illegally refused to entertain the jurisdiction when the evidence disclosed the complicity of the opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 in the alleged offences.

(







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top