SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 8

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, MONJULA BOSE
MATHER AND PLATT (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) IN the assessment year 1975-76, the accounting year ending on December 31, 1974, Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. , the assessee, a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, obtained lease of a premises in New Delhi and another lease of premises at Calcutta known as "nilhat House" respectively for periods of 15 and 20 years. The assessee acquired the said leases for its offices at Calcutta and New Delhi.

( 2 ) IN the said assessment year, the assessee paid a fee of Rs. 42 to its lawyers, viz. , Sandersons and Morgans, Calcutta, in connection with the lease agreement for its office at Nilhat House, and Rs. 380 to Orr Dignam and Co. , New Delhi, for consultation regarding the lease of the said office at Delhi.

( 3 ) ON account of fees for registration of the lease agreement in respect of the premises, Nilhat House, and miscellaneous expenses connected therewith, the assessee incurred an expenditure of Rs. 2,160. The assessee further paid Rs. 12,500 to Cox and Cooks for securing the lease of Nilhat House.

( 4 ) IN its assessment to income-tax for the said assessment year, the assessee claimed deduction of all the aforesaid expenditure aggregating to Rs. 15



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top