SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 5

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTY, GOBINDA CHANDRA CHATTERJEE
SAILEN SETH – Appellant
Versus
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP KUMAR KUNDU, NARAYAN CHANDRA BHATTACHARYYA, SUBRATA KUMAR ROY

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has arisen out of the order dated 3-986 passed by Sri S. B. Muhuri, learned Assistant District Judge, Burdwan, in Title Suit No. 175 of 1985, whereby the learned Judge rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the aforesaid Title Suit against the Steel Authority of India Limited (Defendant No. 1) and other defendants, who were the Officers of the Defendant No. 1 company for a declaration that the stoppage of work in Durgapur Branch stock Yard between the period from June 14, 1984 to July 15, 1984, was due to wrongful, illegal and unwarranted action on the part of the defendants and that the plaintiff was not liable to the defendants for any alleged loss of the defendants arising out of or connected therewith; for accounts in respect of the claim of Rs. 4,63,660/- (four lakhs sixty three thousand six hundred and sixty) demanded by the defendant No. 2 on Jan. 30, 1985, or for any other claim arising out of the stoppage of work during June 14, 1984 to July 15, 1984 and upon such accounting, for refund of the amount which would be found due and payable out of such deduction made upto the date; fo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top