A.M.BHATTACHARJEE, AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
GITA CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
PROBHAT KUMAR CHATTERJEE – Respondent
( 1 ) -THE petitioner-wife, who is the respondent in this appeal, has filed this application under Mecum 44, Hindu Marriage Act for maintenance pendente lite and expenses of the appeal against the husband who is the appellant in this appeal. in the Court below, the husband did not contest the wife's application for pendente Lite maintenance and on consent of the parties, the Court passed an order directing the husband to pay a sum of Rs. 850 per month as maintenance during the trial. Before us, however, the present application by the wife respondent for pendente lite maintenance during the period of this appeal and for expenses of this appeal has been very seriously. opposed by the husband-appellant on the ground that he has now come to learn that the wife owns two pieces of valuable lands in Calcutta and as such she can not be regarded to be one who "has no independent income sufficient for her support" within the meaning of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and is, therefore, not entitled to invoke that Section.
( 2 ) THE wife has not denied that she owns those two plots of lands but has averred in her affidavit that those two plots of vacant land mea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.