SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 31

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTY, GOBINDA CHANDRA CHATTERJEE
HARIHAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR KUMAR PAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C.BASAK, R.P.BAGCHI

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a decision dt. 11-9-1982 of Shri A. K. Dutt, the learned President of the Calcutta Improvement Tribunal in the Reference Case No. 3 of 1979 (A) and it arises out of a dispute with regard to the apportionment of the compensation money which has been awarded by reason of the acquisition of the land with structures and trees thereon in question under the Calcutta Improvement Act.

( 2 ) IT appears that 14 chittacks 20 sq. ft. of land out of the plot No. 731 of mouza Kasba, in premises Nos. 55 and 56, K. N. Sen Road was acquired and the value of the land was assessed at Rs. 1,26,793,62 and the value of the structures and trees on the premises No. 56, K. N. Sen Road was assessed at Rs. 7309. 00 and the value of the structures and trees on the premises Nos. 55 K. N. Sen Road was assessed at Rs. 5,875. 00. The total value of the land with structures and trees thereon was thus assessed at Rs. 1,40,059. 62. The amount of Rs. 3,718. 00 as damage was added to the same under S. 23 of the Land Acquisition Act. Thus the total compensation as awarded was Rs. 1,43,786. 37 after deducting the capitalised value of the Government revenue at Rs. 8.


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top