SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 305

M.K.MUKHERJEE, M.G.MUKHERJI
BHAJAHARI – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL KARIM SHAIKH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Krishna Das, Raghunath Mukherjee

MONOJ KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is by the defendant and it arises out of a suit for partition.

( 2 ) THE suit property comprises of plot Nos. 68, 83, 162 and 181 appertaining to khatian No. 89 of mouza Gahak and it formerly belonged to one Saharjan Sk. who died in the year 1367 B. S. leaving behind two sons Abdul Karim (the plaintiff No. 1) and Abdul Rahim and two daughters Momena Khatun (the plaintiff No. 21 and Mohuda Khatun (the plaintiff No. 3 ). According to the plaintiffs, though there was no partition of their ancestral properties. their brother Abdul Rahim transferred the suit plots to the six defendants by separate sale deeds falsely claiming that he was in exclusive possession thereof pursuant to an amicable partition amongst the co-sharers. By filing the suit the three plaintiffs therefore prayed for partition claiming 2/3rd share in the suit property.

( 3 ) IN contesting the suit the defendants averred that there was an amicable partition of the properties, left behind by Saharjan Sk. amongst his heirs in terms thereof the suit property fell exclusively to the share of Abdul Rahim. Thereafter Abdul Rahim sold some of the suit properties to them by






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top