SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 182

MONORANJAN MALLICK
YUSUF T. I. ATTARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
JAMENA YUSUF T. I. ATTARWALLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HAFIZ-UR-REHMAN, SURENDRA SHARMA

MONORANJAN MULLICK, J.

( 1 ) - This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19,12. 86 passed in Case No. M-18 of 1988 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta by which the Metropolitan Magistrate restored the opposite party-wife's application for maintenance u/s 125 Criminal Procedure Code to its original fife which was dismissed for default on 29. 9. 86.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the petitioner husband it is submitted that the order of the Learned Magistrate setting aside the order dismissing the application for default and restoring such application. to its original file is an illegal order and cannot be sustained and therefore, such an order is liable to be set aside.

( 3 ) THE revision is resisted by the opposite party-wife.

( 4 ) ON pursuing the order passed by the Learned Magistrate, dated 19. 12. 86, I am of the view that by that order the Learned Magistrate appears to have reviewed his earlier order setting aside the order, dated 29. 9. 86 dismissing the application for maintenance u/s 125 Criminal Procedure Code for default. Even though the proceeding u/s 125 Criminal Procedure Code is not criminal pro



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top