SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Cal) 212

SHAMSUDDIN AHMED
RABEA KHATOON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJOY ROY, Pratap Kumar Roy

S. AHMED, J.

( 1 ) - The order under challenge in this writ application is an order passed by the Revenue Officer on 6. 10. 82 in Durgapur Case No. 311 of 1982 u/s 14t of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act as well as an order passed in appeal by the appellate authority being Appeal Case No. 13 of 1983.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioner's grievances are that he does not possess land which is liable to be vested in the State u/s 14t of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act. He appeared before the Revenue Officer and submitted that the lands held, by him are in the non irrigated area. . The Revenue Officer considered the question. He held that, the raiment family held land in mouzas Sathkahania as well as mouza Dhandadihi. He referred to a notification. No. 7352 L, dated 11th July, 1971 of the Land and Land Revenue Department for the purpose of Sec. 14k (d) of the West Bengal L. R. Act. Relying on this notification he held that all the nougat within Kaksa P. S. (Mouza Sathkahania is within this P. S.) are within irrigated area of the D. V. C. Canal project. Accordingly he treated the lands held by the raiyat in the said mouza as irrigated land. At the same time he also held that the land held by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top