L.M.GHOSH, SANKARI PRASAD DAS GHOSH
BIBHABATI GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
PANCHU GOPAL PAUL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the widow of a tenant against a decree for eviction on the ground of reasonable requirement of landlord for his own use and occupation and for use and occupation of the members of his family.
( 2 ) ONE Jatindra Nath Ghosh was a tenant in respect of one room at the ground floor of premises No. 19, Sibdash Bhaduri Street P. S. Shyampukur, Calcutta, (hereinafter called 'the suit-room' for the sake of convenience) under the plaintiff-respondent at rent of Rs. 14. 87 p. , per month, payable according to the English Calendar month. The plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for eviction of Jatindra from the suit-room on twofold grounds viz. , subletting and reasonable requirement of the suit-room by him for use and occupation by the members of his family. During trial, the ground of subletting was not pressed. The defence was a denial of the alleged reasonable requirement of the suit-room by the landlord for use and occupation by the members of his family. A Commissioner for local inspection was appointed in the suit for finding out the present accommodation of the landlord and the accommodation available in the suit-house. The Commis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.