SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 162

High Court Of Calcutta
A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
RATNAMALA DASI - Appellant
Versus
RATAN SINGH BAWA - Respondent
A. F. O. D.  318  Of  1982
Decided On : 04/15/1988

Advocates Appeared:
AMIT PRAKASH, Mrinal Kanti Das, PRANAB KUMAR GANGULY, SAUMYABRATA MUKHERJEE

A tenant can make additions and alterations to the tenanted premises within the limits specified by Cls. (o) and (p) of S. 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, as long as such additions or alterations do not amount to permanent structures or cause damage to the premises.

Headnote:

LANDLORD TENANT - FIXING OF COLLAPSIBLE GATE, CONVERSION OF D. C. CURRENT TO A. C. CURRENT, RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ROOF, SUPPLY OF WATER - S. 33, 108, 109, T. P. ACT - S. 34, SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT - S. 12 (2), ELECTRICITY ACT - DECREE AGREEING WITH JUDGMENT - INTERPRETATION - REMEDY FOR BREACH OF COVENANT - RIGHT OF TENANT TO MAKE ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS - TESTS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURE - ACCESSORY LICENSE.

Fact of the Case:

Tenant filed a suit for declarations and reliefs consequential thereto, including the right to fix a collapsible gate at the entrance to his tenanted flat, conversion of D.C. current to A.C. current in the premises, right of access to the roof for replacing or repairing the antenna for his Television set, and regular supply of water during the morning hours. The landlords filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the tenant from making any new constructions, additions, or alterations to the tenanted premises. The suits were heard together, and the trial court decreed the tenant's suit and restrained the tenant from making any permanent additions, alterations, constructions, and structural changes in the tenanted portion of the premises.

Finding of the Court:

1. The decree of the trial court restraining the tenant from making any permanent additions, alterations, constructions, and structural changes in the tenanted portion of the premises was construed to mean only such additions, alterations, constructions, or structures which are of a permanent nature. 2. A tenant cannot make any construction by way of addition or alteration which is a permanent structure or which is destructive or permanently injurious to the tenanted premises, but within the limits of Cls. (o) and (p) of S. 108 of the T. P. Act, the tenant can add to the premises and make alterations thereto to suit his necessities. 3. The affixation of a collapsible gate at the entrance of the tenanted premises would not amount to the erection of a permanent structure, considering its purpose, mode of affixation, and removability. 4. The tenant has the right to conversion of D.C. current to A.C. current in the premises under S. 12 (2) of the Electricity Act, as amended in 1959, which provides for a disjunctive meaning between 'owner' and 'occupier'. 5. The tenant has the right of access to the roof of the premises for the limited purpose of replacing and repairing the Television Antenna, as it is deemed to be necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the tenancy and falls under the principle of accessory license under S. 55 of the Easements Act. 6. The declaration that the tenant is entitled to regular supply of water and the direction to the landlords to ensure regular supply of water by means of an electrically operated pump were modified due to the acute water scarcity and erratic water supply by the Municipal Corporation.

Issues: 1. Whether the tenant can make additions and alterations to the tenanted premises? 2. Whether the affixation of a collapsible gate at the entrance of the tenanted premises amounts to the erection of a permanent structure? 3. Whether the tenant has the right to conversion of D.C. current to A.C. current in the premises? 4. Whether the tenant has the right of access to the roof of the premises for the purpose of replacing or repairing the antenna for his Television set? 5. Whether the tenant is entitled to regular supply of water during the morning hours?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The decree of the trial court restraining the tenant from making any permanent additions, alterations, constructions, and structural changes in the tenanted portion of the premises was construed to mean only such additions, alterations, constructions, or structures which are of a permanent nature. 2. A tenant cannot make any construction by way of addition or alteration which is a permanent structure or which is destructive or permanently injurious to the tenanted premises, but within the limits of Cls. (o) and (p) of S. 108 of the T. P. Act, the tenant can add to the premises and make alterations thereto to suit his necessities. 3. The affixation of a collapsible gate at the entrance of the tenanted premises would not amount to the erection of a permanent structure, considering its purpose, mode of affixation, and removability. 4. The tenant has the right to conversion of D.C. current to A.C. current in the premises under S. 12 (2) of the Electricity Act, as amended in 1959, which provides for a disjunctive meaning between 'owner' and 'occupier'. 5. The tenant has the right of access to the roof of the premises for the limited purpose of replacing and repairing the Television Antenna, as it is deemed to be necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the tenancy and falls under the principle of accessory license under S. 55 of the Easements Act. 6. The declaration that the tenant is entitled to regular supply of water and the direction to the landlords to ensure regular supply of water by means of an electrically operated pump were modified due to the acute water scarcity and erratic water supply by the Municipal Corporation.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment and decree under appeal were affirmed with the modification that the declaration regarding regular supply of water and the direction to the landlords to ensure regular supply of water were modified in view of the acute water scarcity and erratic water supply.

A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE suit giving rise to this first appeal has been filed by the tenant-respondent against the landlords-appellants for several declarations and reliefs consequential thereto. The declarations are - (a) that he is entitled to fix a collapsible gate at the entrance to his tenanted flat, being the 4th floor of the suit-building, (b) that he is entitled to conversion of D. C. current to A. C. current in the premises, (c) that he has the right of access to the roof of the tenanted premises for the purpose of replacing or repairing the antenna for his Television set, and (d) that he is entitled to regular supply of water during the morning hours, and consequential reliefs are appropriate orders of permanent injunctions to ensure the enjoyment of his aforesaid rights to be declared by the Court. The suit having been decreed is favour of the tenant-plaintiff, the aggrieved landlords have filed this appeal.

( 2 ) THIS suit by the tenant has been preceded by a suit by the landlords against the tenant for permanent injunction restraining the latter from making any new constructions, additions or alterations and structural changes to and in the suit-premises. The two suits have been heard together and the suit by the landlords has also been decreed. In the judgment, which is a common one for both the suits, the trial Judge has held that the suit by the landlords for permanent injunction restraining the tenant "from making any permanent construction in the suit premises should be declared"; but it appears that in the decree portion, the Court has permanently restrained the tenant "from making any additions, alterations, constructions and structural changes" in the tenanted portion of the premises.

( 3 ) UNDER S. 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after a Court has pronounced a judgment," on such judgment a decree shall follow" and under O. 20, R. 6 (1), "the decree shall agree with the judgment". Since in the judgment the trial Court has decided to decree the suit restraining the tenant "from making any permanent construction", the order in the decree restraining the tenant "from making any additions, alterations, constructions and structural changes" must be construed to mean only such additions, alterations, constructions or structures which are of permanent nature. A decree must be so construed as to be intra, and not ultra vires the judgment. The approach should be ut res magis valeat quam pereat, so that it may stand and not fail. If a decree, though apparently going beyond a judgment, may reasonably construe to be agreeing with the latter, it must be so construed.

( 4 ) IT is not the law that a tenant cannot construct any structure on the tenanted premises. Under Cl. (o) of S. 109, Transfer of Property Act, a tenant, who is to use the tenanted property as a person of ordinary prudence would use it if it were his own, has been commanded not to pull down or damage building belonging to the landlord or to commit any other act which is destructive or permanently injurious thereto and under Cl. (p), the tenant has been mandated not to erect on the property anypermanent structure, except for agricultural purposes, but within limits specified by Cls. (o) and (p), a tenant can make such constructions, additions or alterations as would suit his needs. This has been pointed out by one of us in a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Dhanapati v. Gita, (1986) 2 Cal HN 292 at p. 296 and was also pointed out by Mitten J. in his separate, though concurring, judgment in the Special Bench decision of this Court in Surya Properties AIR 1964 Cal 1 at p. 27. We have again adverted to this question in Devakinandan v. Harasundar, (1988) 1 Cal HN 180 at p. 188, where we have held that a combined reading of Cls. (o) and (p) would indicate that though the tenant cannot make any construction by way of addition or alteration which is a permanent structure or which is destructive of or permanently injurious to the tenanted








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top