SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 162

A.M.BHATTACHARJEE, AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
RATNAMALA DASI – Appellant
Versus
RATAN SINGH BAWA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT PRAKASH, Mrinal Kanti Das, PRANAB KUMAR GANGULY, SAUMYABRATA MUKHERJEE

A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE suit giving rise to this first appeal has been filed by the tenant-respondent against the landlords-appellants for several declarations and reliefs consequential thereto. The declarations are - (a) that he is entitled to fix a collapsible gate at the entrance to his tenanted flat, being the 4th floor of the suit-building, (b) that he is entitled to conversion of D. C. current to A. C. current in the premises, (c) that he has the right of access to the roof of the tenanted premises for the purpose of replacing or repairing the antenna for his Television set, and (d) that he is entitled to regular supply of water during the morning hours, and consequential reliefs are appropriate orders of permanent injunctions to ensure the enjoyment of his aforesaid rights to be declared by the Court. The suit having been decreed is favour of the tenant-plaintiff, the aggrieved landlords have filed this appeal.

( 2 ) THIS suit by the tenant has been preceded by a suit by the landlords against the tenant for permanent injunction restraining the latter from making any new constructions, additions or alterations and structural changes to and in the suit-premises. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top