SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 323

A.K.SENGUPTA, J.N.HORE
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
GANGADHAR DAWN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MILAN MUKHARJI, P.R.MONDAL, PARUL BANERJI

A. C. SEN GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE State of West Bengal has preferred this revisional application against the order of the learned Sessions Judge allowing an application under S. 408 Criminal Procedure Code for transfer made by the accused in a Sessions case sometime after the trial of that case began before an Additional Sessions Judge.

( 2 ) THE view of the petitioner is that in view of the provision of Sub-Sec. (2) of S. 409 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Sessions Judge can send such a case from one Court of the Additional District Judge to another Additional Court of District Judge before the trial case began in that Court. S. 409 of the Code of Criminal Procedure runs thus : (1) A Sessions Judge may withdraw any case or appeal from, or recall any case or appeal which he has made over to, any Assistant Sessions Judge or Chief Judicial Magistrate subordinate to him. (2) At any time before the trial of the case or the hearing of the appeal has commenced before the Additional Sessions Judge, a Sessions Judge may recall any case or appeal which he has made over to any Additional Sessions Judge.

( 3 ) THE learned Advocate for the opposite parties on the either hand argued that






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top