SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 344

SUSANTA CHATTERJI
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KANAK CHATTERJI, P.K.CHATTERJI, S.K.Kundu, SOMNATH CHATTERJI

SUSANTA CHATTERJI, J.


( 1 ) THE present writ petition is one of the glaring examples as to how each and every problem of life is brought to the court to find its solution. The writ petitioners have prayed, inter alia, for issuing a writ of mandamus calling upon the respondents and each one of them and their agents to show cause as to why the respondents should not be directed to act in accordance with law and also a writ of certiorari calling upon respondents to certify and to transmit all the records and/or proceedings and papers relating to the proposed agreement of "darjeeling Gurkha Hill Council" to this Court so that the members of the public may get information of the said proposed agreement and for an interim order directing the respondents and other officers to take immediate steps for not to use the word "gurkha'' in the proposed agreement of Darjeeling Hill Council and to take such other necessary steps which would be for the interest of the public at large.

( 2 ) ). It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioners not for, their individual interest, but for the sake of the country at large have filed the present writ petition by way of a public interest litigation












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top