SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 439

SUSANTA CHATTERJI
NEW HOWRAH TRANSPORT CO. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.BAGCHI, SUKUMAR GHOSH

SUSANTA CHATTERJI, J.


( 1 ) FOR effective adjudication as agreed by the learned lawyers appearing for the respective parties both the matters were taken up for consideration. Similar points cover both the cases. Both the writ applications raise a constitutional question as to the vires of S. 29b (2) (c) of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.

( 2 ) IT is asserted that the appropriate authority issuing the certificate as contemplated under S. 29b of sub-sec. (2) (c) of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act has had no basis to arrive at the finding of facts as to the requirement of the landlord concerned and there is non-application of mind both at the time of issuing the certificate and at the time of passing the order by the Rent Controller. Section 29b, sub-sec. (2) (c) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act provide for enquiry or inspection. There is also no provision for verification of the case of the landlord. The said section provides merely a show of an adjudication. Even though the authority is not required to have it verified from the tenant and yet a certificate is being made conclusive. The tenant is being deprived of his property namely his tenancy right without any opportuni









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top