SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 257

SANKAR BHATTACHARYYA
MINA ADHIKARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITAVA GANGULY, CHAITANYA MUKHERJI, DIPAK SENGUPTA

SANKAR BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) IN this revisional application the petitioner prays for quashing the proceeding in C. R. Case No. 111 of 1987 under Section 193, Indian Penal Code pending against her in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Berhampore. It arises thus.

( 2 ) OVER the suicidal death of one Shibani Das by burning on 6. 5. 84 her husband Parasar Das was arraigned before a learned Additional Sessions Judge, Murshidabad, in Sessions Trial No. 2 of January 1987 to answer a charge under Section 306, Indian Penal Code. On the date of incident the petitioner, who is a nurse, was on duty at the New Berhampore General Hospital, where the victim Shibani Das was removed for treatment.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution after being removed to the hospital the victim made a dying declaration before the petitioner and some other nurses to the effect that she chose the path of self-immolation by fire, being unable to bear the tortures by her husband.

( 4 ) DURING Trial, the petitioner was examined as witness No. 3 for the prosecution obviously for the purpose of proving the alleged dying declaration of the deceased. In her examination-in-chief, she admitted that on 6


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top