SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 299

A.M.BHATTACHARJEE, AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
RAJ KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
BARBARA GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN PRAKASH CHATTERJI, ASOKE BANERJI, B.M.MITRA, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, PRADIP GHOSH, S.S.BOSE

A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) A husband filed an application under S. 25, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, against his wife for an order for the return of their minor daughter, then aged about 21/2 years, to his custody on the allegation that the child "was taken away from his lawful custody" by the wife and the application having been dismissed, the husband has preferred this appeal.

( 2 ) HOWEVER anachronistic it may appear to be, even to-day in India, proclaimed to be "secular" in its National Charter and mandated thereby almost four decades ago to secure to all its citizens a Uniform Civil Code, "religion" is still being allowed to have a dominant and decisive role even in secular matters relating to law and its administration and the rights and status of a person in matters relating to marriage, succession, guardianship and the like still depend on the religion he would belong to. The husband here is a Hindu, the wife a Christian and they were married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. What religious community the child would then belong to? The question appears to have been authoritatively settled by both our pre-independence and post-independence Apex Courts, the Judicial























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top