A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) A preliminary mortgage decree for sale was passed against the defendant-appellant which has thereafter been made final and the aggrieved defendant has filed this appeal. The defendant-appellant, having preferred no appeal against the preliminary decree, cannot obviously challenge the correctness of the said preliminary decree in this appeal against the final decree in view of the provisions of Section 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned Counsel for the defendant-appellant has not also attempted to do so. All that she has urged in support of the appeal is that the Trial Judge was wrong in making the preliminary decree final rejecting the defendant-appellant's application under Section 3 of the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 on the erroneous impression that the provisions of that Act can not be invoked after the passage of the preliminary decree.

( 2 ) THE defendant-appellant attempted to resist the passing of the final decree by an application invoking the provisions of the Usurious Loans Act of 1918, the Bengal Money-Lenders Act of 1933 and the Bengal Money Lenders Act of 1940 and he urged that the interest claimed was excessive and the transact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document