SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 198

SANKAR BHATTACHARYYA, J.N.HORE
AJIT KR. CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
SERAMPORE MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.RAY, P.R.ADAK, S.L.HAZRA

SANKAR BHATTACHARYYA, J. N. HORE

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this Rule are co-owners of premises No. 155, Netaji Subhash Avenue, Serampore. Sometime in 1981, they submitted to the Serampore Municipality for sanction a plan for carrying out certain additions and alterations in respect of the said building and the plan was duly sanctioned.

( 2 ) IN September, 1981, however, the Chairman of the Municipality informed petitioner No. 1 in writing that an enquiry would be held in connection with the building plan sanctioned by the Municipality. Accordingly, an enquiry was held and the report submitted disclosed certain deviations from the sanctioned plan.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER, petitioner No. 1 received a letter from the Chairman of the Municipality asking him to explain why certain portions of the building, as mentioned in the letter, would not be demolished. Pursuant to the said letter petitioner No. 1 sent an explanation raising certain objections therein but, ignoring the explanation, a complaint under Section 501 of the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 ('act' for short) was lodged against the petitioners in the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Serampore. The learned Sub-D
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top