R.N.PYNE, PRATIBHA BONNERJEA
TILOKRAM GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
GITA RANI SADHUKHAN – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts of this appeal are shortly as follows: on 9. 10. 53, a deed of Partnership was executed amongst the defendant No. 5 Monoranjan Banerjee, the defendant No. 6 Gopika Ranjan Banerjee, the defendant No. 7 Sachidananda Banerjee as well as one Harihar Mal and one Sibram Ghosh, since deceased and the appellant No. 1. The business carried on by the firm was for exhibiting cinematographic films under the name and style of "surasree Cinema". The Cinema House, one of the assets of the firm, was constructed on a plot of land situated in the district of Howrah. The said plot of land was purchased by the aforesaid six partners and was treated as one of the assets of the said firm. It was an unregistered Partnership and the partners had shares therein as set out in the said Deed. Subsequently Harihar Mal sold his share and the shares of the partners in the firm increased as set out in paragraph 7 of the plaint. This Deed of partnership contained an Arbitration Clause for resolving the disputes arising out of this partnership amongst the parties inter se by arbitration.
( 2 ) DISPUTES and differences arose between the Banerjee Group of Partners and the Ghos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.