SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 207

R.N.PYNE, UMESH C.BANERJEE
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MOHURAGANG GULMA TEA ESTATE – Respondent


UMESH CHANDRA BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE rules of the High Court at Calcutta has special significance in regard to the procedural aspect for the purpose of due administration of justice. It has stood the test of time and the powers of the High Court to frame the rules have been preserved under the Letters Patent which is saved by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. It appears that from time to time, the High Court by resolutions adopted rules of the Original Side which are also being saved by the Letters Patent and Code of Civil Procedure and have binding effect in regard to the suits instituted in the Original Side of this Court and certain other matters related thereto.

( 2 ) THE matter in issue in this appeal is indeed an interesting one, as also important since it involves question in regard to the interpretation of these rules.

( 3 ) CHAPTER XIII of the Original Side Rules of this Court provide a special procedure by way of an originating summons which had its origin in English Rules of Supreme Court. This is undoubtedly a suit in the Original Side, but cannot be equated with it, since under the rules questions are framed for the purpose of being answered by this Court a




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top