SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 367

A.K.SENGUPTA, K.M.YUSUF
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
BANSIDHAR JALAN AND SONS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOITRA, S.K.Mukherji

A. K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the Commissioner, West Bengal-IX, Calcutta, the following question of law has been referred to this court under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), for the assessment year 1972-73 :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal had relied on irrelevant or partly irrelevant materials in holding that the assessee had during the relevant year entered into genuine speculative transactions and suffered a loss amounting to Rs. 1,25,515 in such transactions and/or whether such findings were unreasonable or perverse ?"

( 2 ) THE facts briefly stated are that the Income-tax Officer, while completing the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1972-73, rejected the claim of the assessee for loss of Rs. 1,25,515 in share speculation transaction.

( 3 ) THE matter went before the Tribunal. The findings given by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner were assailed by counsel for the assessee. The Tribunal, after hearing the parties, set aside the findings of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and held that the claim of speculation loss of Rs. 1,25,515 should have been allowed.

( 4 ) AT the h



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top